Hi,
Please improve the Link Tracking tool so the link will be "friendly" so instead of
https://www.domain.com/whmcs/link.php?id=3 it will be like any other Friendly URL.
Also please randomize the id - so instead of just a number it will be a random text similar to the way bitly.com do it.
If you can add some graphic statistics it will be awesome.
Thanks.
Ram
5 Comments
Login to post a comment.
Thanks for your suggestion! Friendly URLs and randomized IDs would definitely improve the look and usability of the link tracking tool. Adding customizable, short link options (like those used by Bitly) could also make links more user-friendly and easier to share.
Graphic statistics would be an excellent addition as well—visual data is always a plus when it comes to tracking and reporting. This would provide a quick and easy way for users to monitor link performance without digging into raw data.
Great ideas! It would be awesome to see these improvements implemented in future updates. https://www.delhirussianescorts.com/
There are several reasons to use the Link Tracking tool - the most important one is to be able to count the clicks such a link is getting - right?
Another reason lots of users are using Link Tracking tools are to be able to send a short link that will be displayed nicely in an text or WhatsApp message instead of the long and "ugly" link.
And of course the main issue is to cause the client to fell safe when clicking on such a link.
So instead of sending to a customer this link:
https://www.domain.com/whmcs/link.php?id=3
We will be able to send it like that:
https://www.domain.com/3fYrEvE
or something similar.
Doing so will help us beautify the link and make it something more trustworthy for customers to click.
Most of our customer will be hesitant to click on a link with link.php?id=3 or any other code that is not commonly use.
This is exactly what https://app.bitly.com/ and may other providers is doing.
So since WHMCS already offer a Link Tracking tool - it can be easily extended and combined with a beautiful short link instead of the correct long and unfriendly one.
What do you think?
Ram
Thanks for your suggestion.
Can you help everyone understand the benefits of your proposed changes vs. the current solution? What problem are you experiencing that this would solve?